I will always believe that an open mind is far more worthy than an open heart. Love is not all you need, and if you think that, I truly despise you. Nothing can ever replace the logic, willpower, and creativity used to overcome problems and mend fences.
I am sick and fucking tired of you failures who love everything. Have some self respect and learn to fucking hate. I swear this youtube generation is a poison threatening to tolerate mediocrity on level of insanity. Fuck you. Fuck your happy go lucky lifestyle. Fuck your play-lists on your ipod, and fuck your favorite cereal. You deserve nothing but the emptiness you truly feel inside when you realize you have yet to find that which you truly must be to find fulfillment.
And no. I am not jealous. I am fed up. Every goddamn time I begin to think a like-minded individual has been cast my way to save me from this god awful loneliness you turn out to be fucking. retarded. Warped on a level that has made your surface shiny like glass and your insides the equivalent of a peeps marshmallow rabbit after three hours in the microwave. You lure others in with a perky attitude or a cold attention-seeking vibe, and when they start to finally act like them selves, you condemn for something you have no right to bitch about. So fuck you.
What good is your open heart when all the people who can truly make you happy, you cannot have because your mind is not free. Grow. The fuck. Up.
Thanks for reading! :)
Saturday, June 25, 2011
America and the Drain Pt. 4.3: Freedom's Face
You (whoever fuckin' reads this) are in for a treat. Yeeaahh that's right. I'm posting not even a few days after my last post instead of months. Sweet deal. So lets get down to business. Right back to where we left off. Freedom.
Ahh, Freedom. That glorious word that when spoken, conjures an image of the western societies of L.A. and New York, over here in the U.S.A. That magical word that distracts the masses from how truly fucked their bastard country is. That simple and elegant word which is used in effort to be patriotic but ends up lobotomizing those within earshot. And this is only one a many words spelled with a capital letter and chauffeured to America like snails on a silver platter. Only rich folk in high society eat snails, and they taste like fat clown asshole. The real reason they eat the shit is because it makes them feel fancy. Much like the word Freedom (capitalized) makes Americans feel secure and in most cases, better than other countries.
As I've gone over before, the government limits the freedom of people. Whether it's choosing which drugs you need to get high, or choosing to marry a same-sex partner, government has it's fingers in your pudding. But it's not just the Man that limits your options when it comes to being free. With the power of logic we can see that almost any outside influence can limit choices, even choose for you.
Women are a large fraction of this outside influence, but to widen the perspective, we'll say 'the opposite sex'. But it's mostly women. Men go apeshit for pussy. 'Dick-whipped' is a myth, but 'pussy-whipped' is an everyday occurrence. Tail is just a carrot on a stick when it comes to relationships. Don't get me wrong, finding that life partner can be a worthy life goal, but if you're getting caught up in that pussy haze and tangled in that "I-just-wanna-get-laid" web, it makes you give up a part of yourself just to fulfill an animal instinct.
Valentines day alone, is proof that women dangle themselves on a stick to score pack mules. While there is a lot pressure involved when it comes to performing and being romantic for both sexes, women definitely have the upper hand. Not showing up with a romantic gift or activity planned is a very bad idea, as most men will tell you.
Religion, too, ties people down, but at a more gap-filling price. Most people turn to religion for comfort of death or just for a way to put their soul and heart into one thing without looking the fool. Either way, there are a few too many rules and taboos involved with religion. Everything from promise rings and sobriety to eating no pork and wearing traditional apparel. People seem to find quite a bit of assurance in ritualistic behaviors, which is why, I guess, so many people get caught up in the mundane. The point is, if you're willing to let an imaginary god figure tell you indirectly what you can and can't do, don't fucking fight for that figurehead of Freedom. It's borderline hypocritical. Again, making this kind of life decision in based on the opinion that what you're getting is worth what you're trading. This is also proof that the wondrous concept of Freedom isn't always on the top of the list of need-to-haves for quite a few people.
Ultimately, Freedom must be defined. Though many might see it differently, I see Freedom as the ability to choose, even if your options are limited and despite the fact that choice is only an illusion. Also, without a governing body, you wouldn't really have to make a lot of big choices. So it can be said that government of any form drags the whole Freedom concept around with it like rusted tin cans tied to the bumper of a marriage buggy. My father when prompted with this question pointed out that it took a whole goddamn Bill of Rights to define individual Freedoms, and a whole goddamn Constitution to define our rights as a nation individual from Britain. It just goes to show you, over hundreds of years we've tried to catalog humankind's limitations in the form of what we think we deserve from other people.
In truth Freedom can only be granted through self-realization. We all have to be open minded and allow the daily bullshit to pass through us. We must learn to identify when someone else, or yes, even your own beliefs begin to impede the progress to Freedom. Its sounds vaguely hippie, but it's true. The only way to true Freedom is self reliance, stubbornness, and a little ignorance. Groovy dudes, hug a rainbow.
Ahh, Freedom. That glorious word that when spoken, conjures an image of the western societies of L.A. and New York, over here in the U.S.A. That magical word that distracts the masses from how truly fucked their bastard country is. That simple and elegant word which is used in effort to be patriotic but ends up lobotomizing those within earshot. And this is only one a many words spelled with a capital letter and chauffeured to America like snails on a silver platter. Only rich folk in high society eat snails, and they taste like fat clown asshole. The real reason they eat the shit is because it makes them feel fancy. Much like the word Freedom (capitalized) makes Americans feel secure and in most cases, better than other countries.
As I've gone over before, the government limits the freedom of people. Whether it's choosing which drugs you need to get high, or choosing to marry a same-sex partner, government has it's fingers in your pudding. But it's not just the Man that limits your options when it comes to being free. With the power of logic we can see that almost any outside influence can limit choices, even choose for you.
Women are a large fraction of this outside influence, but to widen the perspective, we'll say 'the opposite sex'. But it's mostly women. Men go apeshit for pussy. 'Dick-whipped' is a myth, but 'pussy-whipped' is an everyday occurrence. Tail is just a carrot on a stick when it comes to relationships. Don't get me wrong, finding that life partner can be a worthy life goal, but if you're getting caught up in that pussy haze and tangled in that "I-just-wanna-get-laid" web, it makes you give up a part of yourself just to fulfill an animal instinct.
Valentines day alone, is proof that women dangle themselves on a stick to score pack mules. While there is a lot pressure involved when it comes to performing and being romantic for both sexes, women definitely have the upper hand. Not showing up with a romantic gift or activity planned is a very bad idea, as most men will tell you.
Religion, too, ties people down, but at a more gap-filling price. Most people turn to religion for comfort of death or just for a way to put their soul and heart into one thing without looking the fool. Either way, there are a few too many rules and taboos involved with religion. Everything from promise rings and sobriety to eating no pork and wearing traditional apparel. People seem to find quite a bit of assurance in ritualistic behaviors, which is why, I guess, so many people get caught up in the mundane. The point is, if you're willing to let an imaginary god figure tell you indirectly what you can and can't do, don't fucking fight for that figurehead of Freedom. It's borderline hypocritical. Again, making this kind of life decision in based on the opinion that what you're getting is worth what you're trading. This is also proof that the wondrous concept of Freedom isn't always on the top of the list of need-to-haves for quite a few people.
Ultimately, Freedom must be defined. Though many might see it differently, I see Freedom as the ability to choose, even if your options are limited and despite the fact that choice is only an illusion. Also, without a governing body, you wouldn't really have to make a lot of big choices. So it can be said that government of any form drags the whole Freedom concept around with it like rusted tin cans tied to the bumper of a marriage buggy. My father when prompted with this question pointed out that it took a whole goddamn Bill of Rights to define individual Freedoms, and a whole goddamn Constitution to define our rights as a nation individual from Britain. It just goes to show you, over hundreds of years we've tried to catalog humankind's limitations in the form of what we think we deserve from other people.
In truth Freedom can only be granted through self-realization. We all have to be open minded and allow the daily bullshit to pass through us. We must learn to identify when someone else, or yes, even your own beliefs begin to impede the progress to Freedom. Its sounds vaguely hippie, but it's true. The only way to true Freedom is self reliance, stubbornness, and a little ignorance. Groovy dudes, hug a rainbow.
Wednesday, June 22, 2011
America and the Drain Pt. 4.2: Freedom? It's a Relative Thing.
As I've discussed before, Freedom as defined by the U.S. government, can be proven over and over, to be false. It is simply a word the system has adopted to use as chaff against our missiles of logic. Much like an antagonized chimpanzee might fling leaves and dirt at an opponent to keep him distracted or blinded, even appear more intimidating. It is a fact, in my eyes, that the government opposes the masses, rather than actually seek out the greater good for them as a people.
Whether or not the big man is truly hostile towards the common man,(which proof can be provided to show), is not today's business. Yes today's business is in parallel to my previous post about gay rights. The big question here is: Is America a truly free country? The answer? Ehh...It's a relative thing.
Most of the yes and no bullshit we encounter during this argument can be filed under one of four categories, though most of them will overlap considerably. Misinformation, prejudice, hypocrisy, and greed. The four cornerstones of any establishment that sees itself above the common people. And now, without further ado, I present to you, a pocketful of examples.
The War On Drugs: Not only is this phrase an impossibility, but also a farce. It was and remains today a phrase coined by the presidency to make it appear more legitimate in aggressive policies. It is the brother to 'The War on Terrorism', yet another idiotic phrase used to deter assholes who bring logic into the situation. Logically, it works against the publishers. Any place you revoke the main means of recreation, namely drugs, the people will invent other ways to have fun, and in this case, get their fix. In a brilliant stroke of irony, without the drugs, people can actually USE their brains to invent better ways to get high. During prohibition, there was a man who actually invented an engine that ran on alcohol. Many will attribute this to a leading cause of the end of prohibition, but it makes sense. "Well, I have this liquor lying around and I can't drink it. Fuck, what happens if I pour it into my Jalopy?"
In all seriousness, most people who oppose drugs have either never tried them (properly), or they believe that drugs do so much harm to your body that they're not even worth trying in the first place. Simple misinformation. The prejudice lies in thinking that only certain stereotypes of people take certain drugs, and while this may actually be true, they have no right to believe it after trying to force diversity onto college brochures and fill offices with diversity requirements. The hypocrisy, and the best part of this baffling and quizzical issue in my opinion, is that plenty of higher ups have been caught red handed abusing drugs. Drugs such as Oxycontin, which you can get for the fraction of the price the yuppies addicted to them pay for them, over the counter. Studies have emerged over the past several years, showing an increase in certain drug use among the wealthy, as opposed to certain drug use among the poor. And finally, the greed in this subject lies easily spotted among legalization. Every pothead can tell you that one of the truest reasons that government cannot legalize marijuana is that they can't put a tax on it. It holds water. We all know how closely snuggled the drug companies and government are. Fuck, they even invented a cure for cancer in the 1930s, and the corrupted medical associations covered it up. They wanted to treat cancer, not cure it. Extortion through a third party.
Now, I bring drugs up in particular because I have a comparable example to America's level of freedom. Why can't any FREE citizen of this FREE country be FREE to choose which drugs they put into their body. Government is even cracking down on private farmers because they believe that the raw milk is harmful (which it isn't). Plus, you eventually get a whole lot less people to deal with if folks are overdosing left and right. It would be a wonderful way to test who has the genes to pass on to the next generation. Eventually if everyone was doing drugs, their children would become immune to getting high, and we would simply step out of the era like a pair of loafers with dog shit on them.
In several countries throughout Europe, there are drug bars. That's right; places where you can go to get your rocks off. Nearly everything is legal there. But it doesn't end with a deal, no. After purchasing drugs, you have to sit and smoke that joint or live out your heroin trip right there in the bar. They actually take responsibility for the people they deal to. Whereas we here in America let drunkards walk right out of bars, keys in hand, and then wonder why drunk driver mortality rates get higher each year.
Personally I think there would be a lot less need for drugs if government would shut the fuck up. Leaving someone alone in a room with a ton of heroin just means that they'll eventually get bored of heroin. So, bottom line. Is America, in the context of drug use and bodily choices, free? No. Is it free in the overall sense of personal choices and agendas? We'll find out in part three.
Whether or not the big man is truly hostile towards the common man,(which proof can be provided to show), is not today's business. Yes today's business is in parallel to my previous post about gay rights. The big question here is: Is America a truly free country? The answer? Ehh...It's a relative thing.
Most of the yes and no bullshit we encounter during this argument can be filed under one of four categories, though most of them will overlap considerably. Misinformation, prejudice, hypocrisy, and greed. The four cornerstones of any establishment that sees itself above the common people. And now, without further ado, I present to you, a pocketful of examples.
The War On Drugs: Not only is this phrase an impossibility, but also a farce. It was and remains today a phrase coined by the presidency to make it appear more legitimate in aggressive policies. It is the brother to 'The War on Terrorism', yet another idiotic phrase used to deter assholes who bring logic into the situation. Logically, it works against the publishers. Any place you revoke the main means of recreation, namely drugs, the people will invent other ways to have fun, and in this case, get their fix. In a brilliant stroke of irony, without the drugs, people can actually USE their brains to invent better ways to get high. During prohibition, there was a man who actually invented an engine that ran on alcohol. Many will attribute this to a leading cause of the end of prohibition, but it makes sense. "Well, I have this liquor lying around and I can't drink it. Fuck, what happens if I pour it into my Jalopy?"
In all seriousness, most people who oppose drugs have either never tried them (properly), or they believe that drugs do so much harm to your body that they're not even worth trying in the first place. Simple misinformation. The prejudice lies in thinking that only certain stereotypes of people take certain drugs, and while this may actually be true, they have no right to believe it after trying to force diversity onto college brochures and fill offices with diversity requirements. The hypocrisy, and the best part of this baffling and quizzical issue in my opinion, is that plenty of higher ups have been caught red handed abusing drugs. Drugs such as Oxycontin, which you can get for the fraction of the price the yuppies addicted to them pay for them, over the counter. Studies have emerged over the past several years, showing an increase in certain drug use among the wealthy, as opposed to certain drug use among the poor. And finally, the greed in this subject lies easily spotted among legalization. Every pothead can tell you that one of the truest reasons that government cannot legalize marijuana is that they can't put a tax on it. It holds water. We all know how closely snuggled the drug companies and government are. Fuck, they even invented a cure for cancer in the 1930s, and the corrupted medical associations covered it up. They wanted to treat cancer, not cure it. Extortion through a third party.
Now, I bring drugs up in particular because I have a comparable example to America's level of freedom. Why can't any FREE citizen of this FREE country be FREE to choose which drugs they put into their body. Government is even cracking down on private farmers because they believe that the raw milk is harmful (which it isn't). Plus, you eventually get a whole lot less people to deal with if folks are overdosing left and right. It would be a wonderful way to test who has the genes to pass on to the next generation. Eventually if everyone was doing drugs, their children would become immune to getting high, and we would simply step out of the era like a pair of loafers with dog shit on them.
In several countries throughout Europe, there are drug bars. That's right; places where you can go to get your rocks off. Nearly everything is legal there. But it doesn't end with a deal, no. After purchasing drugs, you have to sit and smoke that joint or live out your heroin trip right there in the bar. They actually take responsibility for the people they deal to. Whereas we here in America let drunkards walk right out of bars, keys in hand, and then wonder why drunk driver mortality rates get higher each year.
Personally I think there would be a lot less need for drugs if government would shut the fuck up. Leaving someone alone in a room with a ton of heroin just means that they'll eventually get bored of heroin. So, bottom line. Is America, in the context of drug use and bodily choices, free? No. Is it free in the overall sense of personal choices and agendas? We'll find out in part three.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)